The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:24 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:06 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Diamondeye wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Keep in mind, I'm not advocating any one position over another. I'm pointing out the inherent hypocrisy in our dealings with both indigenous and conquered peoples in this nation and in others.


I was going to respond to this but I'm a little unclear what hypocrisy you're referring to. I'd also point out that it's somewhat hypocritical of indigenous people in this day and age to want to have it both ways. Avoiding hypocrisy is a good thing, but it's not the end goal of national policy.


The various attitudes regarding Palestine, for example.

Either the conquerors win, or they don't. There cannot be mealy-mouthing on that particular issue without blatant hypocrisy.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:40 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
DFK! wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Keep in mind, I'm not advocating any one position over another. I'm pointing out the inherent hypocrisy in our dealings with both indigenous and conquered peoples in this nation and in others.


I was going to respond to this but I'm a little unclear what hypocrisy you're referring to. I'd also point out that it's somewhat hypocritical of indigenous people in this day and age to want to have it both ways. Avoiding hypocrisy is a good thing, but it's not the end goal of national policy.


The various attitudes regarding Palestine, for example.

Either the conquerors win, or they don't. There cannot be mealy-mouthing on that particular issue without blatant hypocrisy.


Again, avoiding hypocrisy is not the primary goal of national policy. In any case, the problem of Palestine is unique in that Israel didn't intend to conquer the West Bank or Gaza in any long-term sense; it wanted to trade them back for a peace agreement. That wasn't forthcoming. Israel was mistaken in conducting its cost-benefit analysis and hasn't always handled the issue well since, but the fact of the matter is that if Egypt hadn't been planning an attack in 1967, Israel wouldn't have attacked it first and ended up with these territories.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:42 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Diamondeye wrote:
Again, avoiding hypocrisy is not the primary goal of national policy.


Indeed, but you can't begin to say that public perception and image both domestically and internationally doesn't play a role in diplomacy and politicking. Hence at both the organizational and the individual politician-trying-to-get-re-elected levels, it is important.

Primary? No.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:36 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
DFK! wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Again, avoiding hypocrisy is not the primary goal of national policy.


Indeed, but you can't begin to say that public perception and image both domestically and internationally doesn't play a role in diplomacy and politicking. Hence at both the organizational and the individual politician-trying-to-get-re-elected levels, it is important.

Primary? No.


In the short-term, domestic respect that's true. However, "national hypocrisy" is pretty broad and vague, and often runs into the problem that the "hypocrisy" is a matter of 2 different people who are not only not necessarily in government but may not even be alive at the same time doing 2 different things in response to 2 different situations which may or may not be more than superficially similar.

While perception is certainly part of international image and politics as well, avoiding it is really more a matter of it being convenient or inconvenient for other nations to make an issue of it. Every nation is hypocritical in the respect I just mentioned. It's pretty easy to pick out some aspect of a nation's overall policy and hammer it on the international scene to make it seem like the bad guy. In some cases its a very tangible problem with that nation; in many other cases its simply the leaders of the (politically) attacking nation siezing on public perceptions and selectively making an issue of something.

This issue is a perfect example. Ok, the U.S. overran and took over some indigenous tribal nations in North America and the Pacific. This was in an era where a lot of other countries in Europe were doing the same thing; the major difference is that the U.S. did a much better job of hanging onto its posessions. Of course, that isn't to say "Europe did it too!" but look at the condition of a lot of Ex-European posessions. How does Viet Nam or the Sudan have it compared to American Indian tribes?

A lot of the time the accusation of hypocrisy is really just cricticizing the victor for having the bad taste to win, especially if they do a good job of it.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
It never ceases to amaze me how quick some conservatives are to accept the doctrine of might makes right.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Monte wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how quick some conservatives are to accept the doctrine of might makes right.


Because it does? I'm not conservative but you'd have to be utterly retarded not to see it. We might decry "might makes right" here in the borders of the US because there are laws that protect the "weak" from the "strong," but on an international level the people with the bigger guns decide what is right and wrong.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
It doesn't make right. It makes what is. There is a huge difference.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
I can easily make myself right (at least about moral issues, I can't make myself right about things like physical laws) by killing everyone who says I am wrong and pretending they never existed. One generation later, no one will even know of the concept of declaring me wrong.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Monte wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how quick some conservatives are to accept the doctrine of might makes right.

The reason you have this illusion that it doesn't is simply because we have a very powerful might prepared to enforce our non-"might-makes-right" ideals.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:44 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
It never ceases to amaze me how many liberals will embrace a philosophy of might makes wrong.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:31 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Diamondeye wrote:
How does Viet Nam or the Sudan have it compared to American Indian tribes?


Far better. Orders of magnitude better, in fact. There is more than 10% of their population left alive, for example.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:42 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
DFK! wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
How does Viet Nam or the Sudan have it compared to American Indian tribes?


Far better. Orders of magnitude better, in fact. There is more than 10% of their population left alive, for example.


I don't see how the size of the population is a measure of how well that population is doing. I'd also like to know how, since there are a great many people that have various percentages of Native American ancestry in them, how this 10% is arrived at.

Finally the assertion that the quality of life is orders of magnitude better in either the Sudan or Viet Nam than for any population within the U.S. is pretty absurd. The thread really pertains towards the situation of native populations now, not the history of various things that have happened to them over the years.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:52 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Yes, and as it pertains to now, there are 90% less Native Americans than there should be, if not more. All their land has been stolen.

The Vietnamese and Sudanese both: 1) Have their land, and 2) aren't missing as much of their population.

They win.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
DFK! wrote:
Yes, and as it pertains to now, there are 90% less Native Americans than there should be, if not more.

Link?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:19 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Yes, and as it pertains to now, there are 90% less Native Americans than there should be, if not more.

Link?


Abstract of book indicates from 75 million to "a few". That indicates no more than probably 10% remained.

http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/cu ... o=EJ407452


Another source, indicating anywhere at most a ~21% survival rate:
http://countmazz.wordpress.com/2009/01/ ... -genocide/
Quote:
By the beginning of the twentieth century, government officials found only 250,000 Indian survivors in the territory of the United States… Meanwhile, scholarly estimates of pre-Columbian North American population range from 1.2 million all the way to 20 million.


More, geography specific:
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/d ... tions.html
Quote:
From the 16th century through the early 20th century, no fewer than 93 confirmed epidemics and pandemics — all of which can be attributed to European contagions — decimated the American Indian population. Native American populations in the American Southwest plummeted by a staggering 90 percent or more.


Wiki's opinion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history
Quote:
Scholars now believe that, among the various contributing factors, epidemic disease was the overwhelming cause of the population decline of the American natives.[19] After first contacts with Europeans and Africans, some believe that the death of 90 to 95% of the native population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases such as smallpox and measles.[20]




Now, to be fair, lots of those deaths, clearly were caused by disease. Of course, giving smallpox blankets to natives as gifts sort of clouds the issue.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:31 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
DFK! wrote:
Now, to be fair, lots of those deaths, clearly were caused by disease. Of course, giving smallpox blankets to natives as gifts sort of clouds the issue.

A classic example of a gift that keeps on giving.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:32 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Screeling wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Now, to be fair, lots of those deaths, clearly were caused by disease. Of course, giving smallpox blankets to natives as gifts sort of clouds the issue.

A classic example of a gift that keeps on giving.



Okay, alol.


This post is proof that unPC comments can be hilarious.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
All their land has been stolen.


That gets back to my original point. They signed a treaty. Legally, it's not that simple.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:12 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Dey Terk eer Jerbs!

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
None of which indicates any quantifiable statistics relative to "today," which was your assertion, DFK!. How many Native Americans "should" there be today (accounting for intermingling bloodlines taking a lot of families out of the running, etc.) vs. how many there are?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:06 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
None of which indicates any quantifiable statistics relative to "today," which was your assertion, DFK!. How many Native Americans "should" there be today (accounting for intermingling bloodlines taking a lot of families out of the running, etc.) vs. how many there are?


How many Jews "should" there be today?


The ancestral base having been decimated directly correlates to current populations.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Not necessarily. Would the Native American population, had European colonists not come over and stolen lands, still have significant nomadic lifestyles? The population density for North America pre-European arrival is *much* lower; probably orders of magnitude lower; than that of European areas, and the European influenced colonies that came after.

Thus, without proof (or supported assertions) that Native American Tribes would have abandoned their culture without intervention, you can't determine whether the population that would have resulted from no interference is greater than the mingled and Europeanized (cities, towns, raping the landscape to make way for human population increases) descendent population that has resulted from the intervention and stealing the land.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:49 pm 
Offline
Homeric Hero
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:03 am
Posts: 290
Disease killed most of the natives.

_________________
"The map is not the territory."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:58 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Not necessarily. Would the Native American population, had European colonists not come over and stolen lands, still have significant nomadic lifestyles? The population density for North America pre-European arrival is *much* lower; probably orders of magnitude lower; than that of European areas, and the European influenced colonies that came after.

Thus, without proof (or supported assertions) that Native American Tribes would have abandoned their culture without intervention, you can't determine whether the population that would have resulted from no interference is greater than the mingled and Europeanized (cities, towns, raping the landscape to make way for human population increases) descendent population that has resulted from the intervention and stealing the land.


I'm not arguing "no intervention." I'm arguing "no genocide."

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Okay, no genocide. However, we still haven't stolen lands and imposed a change in the tribal culture and lifestyle. So, presumably you have evidence that, for example, the Great Plains tribes would not have continued to chase buffalo, and would instead have settled down into cities?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group