Kaffis Mark V wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Yes, and as it pertains to now, there are 90% less Native Americans than there should be, if not more.
Link?
Abstract of book indicates from 75 million to "a few". That indicates no more than probably 10% remained.
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/cu ... o=EJ407452Another source, indicating anywhere at most a ~21% survival rate:
http://countmazz.wordpress.com/2009/01/ ... -genocide/Quote:
By the beginning of the twentieth century, government officials found only 250,000 Indian survivors in the territory of the United States… Meanwhile, scholarly estimates of pre-Columbian North American population range from 1.2 million all the way to 20 million.
More, geography specific:
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/d ... tions.htmlQuote:
From the 16th century through the early 20th century, no fewer than 93 confirmed epidemics and pandemics — all of which can be attributed to European contagions — decimated the American Indian population. Native American populations in the American Southwest plummeted by a staggering 90 percent or more.
Wiki's opinion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_historyQuote:
Scholars now believe that, among the various contributing factors, epidemic disease was the overwhelming cause of the population decline of the American natives.[19] After first contacts with Europeans and Africans, some believe that the death of 90 to 95% of the native population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases such as smallpox and measles.[20]
Now, to be fair, lots of those deaths, clearly were caused by disease. Of course, giving smallpox blankets to natives as gifts sort of clouds the issue.