The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Khross wrote:
Somalia, Zimbabwe, the Weimar Republic, Japan between the Wars, and any number of other failed states over history have shown, monetizing your debt is always a losing proposition.

None of those states failed because they tried to monetize their debt, they had much greater underlying problems. Would they have fared any better if they had refused to monetize their debt? Can you give me an example of a state that has failed because they refused to pay off their debts?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:32 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Amanar:

I didn't say they failed because they monetized their debt; I said they demonstrated that monetizing your debt is a losing proposition. There's a difference. As for refusing to pay off your debts, that works quite well when no one can bring enough force to collect.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Just as a complete aside, why on earth would someone give Obama the Nicolay Draft of the Gettysburg Address, when Lincoln affixed his signature and a date to the Bliss Version?

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:48 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Khross wrote:
Just as a complete aside, why on earth would someone give Obama the Nicolay Draft of the Gettysburg Address, when Lincoln affixed his signature and a date to the Bliss Version?


Wait what?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Müs wrote:
Khross wrote:
Just as a complete aside, why on earth would someone give Obama the Nicolay Draft of the Gettysburg Address, when Lincoln affixed his signature and a date to the Bliss Version?
Wait what?
The Learn the Address website recorded Barack Obama reading the Gettysburg Address. They claimed it was the Nicolay Version of the address, which omits the phrase "under God." The Bliss Version, which is widely regarded as the canonical and authoritative version of the Gettysburg Address, contains that phrase.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Khross wrote:
Müs wrote:
Khross wrote:
Just as a complete aside, why on earth would someone give Obama the Nicolay Draft of the Gettysburg Address, when Lincoln affixed his signature and a date to the Bliss Version?
Wait what?
The Learn the Address website recorded Barack Obama reading the Gettysburg Address. They claimed it was the Nicolay Version of the address, which omits the phrase "under God." The Bliss Version, which is widely regarded as the canonical and authoritative version of the Gettysburg Address, contains that phrase.

He doesn't want his Muslim Christian faith to offend anybody?

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:38 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
You know, I'd love to see a working, efficient, universal health care system in America. I really would. I don't think "Obamacare" can ever be that system, but I'd love to see it.

But were I in America, and bought into this guy's rhetoric (in the OP), it'd be enough to make me actively work toward the failure of Obamacare.

There should be no "we-ness" in government. "Liberal government" needs to die. Government needs to be shrunk and curtailed and hobbled so it serves only the purpose of protecting our rights, and providing some semblance of "equality of opportunity," but not ever endeavoring to provide "equality of outcome."

We are not one big happy family. We aren't 'in it together.' We shouldn't be forced to 'help each other out.' This is not cooperation. This is competition. If I don't like that person, then that person can **** off. I don't want any of this touchy feely garbage.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Talya wrote:
You know, I'd love to see a working, efficient, universal health care system in America....

There should be no "we-ness" in government. "Liberal government" needs to die. Government needs to be shrunk and curtailed and hobbled so it serves only the purpose of protecting our rights, and providing some semblance of "equality of opportunity," but not ever endeavoring to provide "equality of outcome."

How do you square these two views, Taly?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Hopwin wrote:
Then you went on to define a war as a signature policy:
Quote:
And again, it wasn't the signature policy of the Bush Administration the way that Iraq was.

Bush's signature policy for his election was education. That was derailed by the 9/11 attack. He was even reading to a class full of kids when the towers were hit.

Claiming otherwise is a lie.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:35 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
RangerDave wrote:
How do you square these two views, Taly?


Much like education, I consider health care part of "Equality of Opportunity."

Your upward mobility within society should not be limited because of where you started. Everything should be within your own control. There's nothing more limiting to your opportunities than dying or suffering a disability because your parents couldn't afford your healthcare.

Government is there to provide the framework that allows everyone to make themselves prosperous. It's not there to help them climb that framework, or to make other people wait while they do.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Quote:
That would assume that A) a 2-state solution is even viable, given that the other side wants a one state (that state being "anything run by Arab muslims") solution and rejected 2 states back in 1947. It also takes the questionable position that it is somehow harming our interests to support Israel, and makes a lot of highly questionable assertions about Israeli politics, especially in light of the untrustworthiness of those they are supposed to be dealing with. It's entirely too easy for us or the Europeans to sit over here and be critical of the Israelis just because the Arab states have given up on major armed conflict and let the Palestinians take the role of underdog.

To the degree Israel is ethno-nationalist it is because their opponents have made it clear that being anything else will be used as an inroad to end the Israeli state as it presently exists, wither through conquest or through the weight of numbers were they to hand out citizenship and franchise. This is a perfect example of why "human rights" as an international issue is a complete fraud.


That's a horrifically bleak view, you're basically saying the Palestinians have no hope no matter what they do, as Israel cannot risk enfranchising them even if they were to dispense with the violence.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:39 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
1. The Palestinians have a state, it's called Jordan.

2. How do you live with Someone who generally speaking wants to "Drive you into the Sea.

However I think we are drifting here.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:57 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Umm... no, Jordan is the Jordanian State. The Palestinians HAD a country called Palestine before the West stepped in and gave it to the Jews.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:07 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:
That would assume that A) a 2-state solution is even viable, given that the other side wants a one state (that state being "anything run by Arab muslims") solution and rejected 2 states back in 1947. It also takes the questionable position that it is somehow harming our interests to support Israel, and makes a lot of highly questionable assertions about Israeli politics, especially in light of the untrustworthiness of those they are supposed to be dealing with. It's entirely too easy for us or the Europeans to sit over here and be critical of the Israelis just because the Arab states have given up on major armed conflict and let the Palestinians take the role of underdog.

To the degree Israel is ethno-nationalist it is because their opponents have made it clear that being anything else will be used as an inroad to end the Israeli state as it presently exists, wither through conquest or through the weight of numbers were they to hand out citizenship and franchise. This is a perfect example of why "human rights" as an international issue is a complete fraud.


That's a horrifically bleak view, you're basically saying the Palestinians have no matter what they do, as Israel cannot risk enfranchising them even if they were to dispense with the violence.


Imagine Mexico intentionally sent 20 million illegal immigrants to Texas. These Mexicans immediately started committing acts of violence against Texas, claiming they would end the state of Texas. Then the international community demanded that Texas be divided and the illegal Mexicans be given their own independent state.

That is the position Israel is in. Let's not paint them as the aggressor here. The Palestinians were not there at all until the Arab nations around what would later be Israel decided to dilute the Hebrew population by displacing them with Arab people.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:30 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Someone should play devil's advocate, here. That's also what it looks like "the west" did to Israel. After WW2, the European nations went looking for a place to dump their unwanted Jews.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Talya wrote:
That is the position Israel is in. Let's not paint them as the aggressor here. The Palestinians were not there at all until the Arab nations around what would later be Israel decided to dilute the Hebrew population by displacing them with Arab people.

Um, what? Do you have a source for this? Everything I've read says that the Jews were the minority when Israel was formed, even if you discount Arab immigrants.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
It's not the end of liberal government.

I'd say it's the end of *real* conservative political power (as opposed to the GOP). The number of people that have found that they can vote themselves money out of the wallets of those that have earned it by supporting liberal politicians who pander to their sloth for political gain has reached a tipping point, in my opinion.

The brouhaha about ACA is just a flash in the pan.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Hopwin wrote:
Umm... no, Jordan is the Jordanian State. The Palestinians HAD a country called Palestine before the West stepped in and gave it to the Jews.


No. Not exactly. Take a look at this link if you want a bird's eye view of the general history. There was no sovereign, independent Palestine.

http://www.masada2000.org/historical.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Ultimately, what it comes down to is that Arab Muslims are upset that one of their holy cities is occupied by people who are neither Arab or Muslim.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:34 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Palestinians for hundreds and hundreds of years have been more akin to Middle Eastern Gypsies than a people with a nation-state.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:43 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
Umm... no, Jordan is the Jordanian State. The Palestinians HAD a country called Palestine before the West stepped in and gave it to the Jews.


No. Not exactly. Take a look at this link if you want a bird's eye view of the general history. There was no sovereign, independent Palestine.

http://www.masada2000.org/historical.html

Are you sure?

Image

I keep googling and coming up with Israel occupying that spot which is weird since it didn't exist until 1948.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
That's not to say they weren't wronged, just that (surprise, surprise) it's not so simple.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Xequecal wrote:
That's a horrifically bleak view, you're basically saying the Palestinians have no hope no matter what they do, as Israel cannot risk enfranchising them even if they were to dispense with the violence.


Gee, you think? And at the same time, Israel is perpetually trapped in needing to fight an endless war against an enemy that has their destruction as an avowed goal and that also cannot be effectively dismantled or destroyed. That same enemy gets the benefit of international "human rights" hypocrisy at every turn, and has managed to goatscrew every attempt at a peaceful solution so far, and really doesn't want one.

No real solution is workable until the Palestinians change their fundamental goal to one that Israel can live with. The 2-state solution is the end result of that, but the reason there's no commitment to it now is that it would just be one more enemy state with the goal of conquering Israel. Like Lebanon, it would just be a new, more organized funnel for Iranian and other elements for whom attacking Israel is a favored pastime.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Hopwin wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
Umm... no, Jordan is the Jordanian State. The Palestinians HAD a country called Palestine before the West stepped in and gave it to the Jews.


No. Not exactly. Take a look at this link if you want a bird's eye view of the general history. There was no sovereign, independent Palestine.

http://www.masada2000.org/historical.html

Are you sure?

Image

I keep googling and coming up with Israel occupying that spot which is weird since it didn't exist until 1948.


Yes, did you read the link? It was remnant of the Ottoman Empire, which, defeated, was control by Britain.

Quote:
In 1923, the British divided the "Palestine" portion of the Ottoman Empire into two administrative districts. Jews would be permitted only west of the Jordan river. In effect, the British had "chopped off" 75% of the originally proposed Jewish Palestinian homeland to form an Arab Palestinian nation called Trans-Jordan (meaning "across the Jordan River"). This territory east of the Jordan River was given to Emir Abdullah (from Hejaz, now Saudi Arabia) who was not even an Arab-"Palestinian!" This portion of Palestine was renamed Trans-Jordan. Trans-Jordan would again be renamed "Jordan" in 1946. In other words, the eastern 3/4 of Palestine would be renamed TWICE, in effect, erasing all connection to the name "Palestine!" However, the bottom line is that the Palestinian Arabs had THEIR "Arab Palestinian" homeland. The remaining 25% of Palestine (now WEST of the Jordan River) was to be the Jewish Palestinian homeland. However, sharing was not part of the Arab psychological makeup then nor now.

Encouraged and incited by growing Arab nationalism throughout the Middle East, the Arabs of that small remaining Palestinian territory west of the Jordan River launched never-ending murderous attacks upon the Jewish Palestinians in an effort to drive them out. Most terrifying were the Hebron massacres of 1929 and later during the 1936-39 "Arab Revolt." The British at first tried to maintain order but soon (due to the large oil deposits being discovered throughout the Arab Middle East) turned a blind eye. It became painfully clear to the Palestinian Jews that they must fight the Arabs AND drive out the British.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group