Stathol wrote:
Lenas wrote:
He hasn't said anything offensive, his attitude of "I know better than the nationally renowned multi-decade veteran of neurological behavior" that's annoying. As if we should just completely disregard the original article and viewpoint because his daughter has a condition and he's the only person to ever deal with "ADHD" first-hand.
I think you're misreading what he's saying. I doubt he completely disagrees with Mr. Expert. But in any case, being nationally renowned or a multi-decade veteran doesn't mean that you're automatically completely right 100% of the time. There are many just as renowned and just as experienced people who hold differing opinions. All TheRiov is saying is that, having done a lot of research on the subject, and having weighed the opinions and studies of many experts, he believes that the preponderance of the evidence suggests that ADHD does exist. But hey, **** him, right?
Except of course for the fact that he told everyone else they basically aren't entitled to THEIR opinion either, which I re-posted for your convenience. But hey, **** that, right? That can't possibly have anything to do with the reaction.
Stathol wrote:
No, that's just it. The reason this thread sticks out at me is that, well... To be totally blunt, I'm not TheRiov's #1 fan. I don't have particularly sympathetic feelings towards the guy. So okay, you don't like TheRiov. I get it. But seriously, how screwed in the head do you have to be to think that justifies saying **** like this to someone?:
Funny, you weren't too concerned a few threads ago when I related how my child-rearing methods resulted in an adult daughter that's independent, well-educated, well-adjusted, and taking as much responsibility for herself as she could manage, and got told I was an idiot for not following someone else's child-rearing principles. Not that it really mattered, I'm pretty damn confident my results speak for themselves compared to some of the utter train wrecks people relate, or people who haven't raised a kid and just talk out of their ***.
This thread really SHOULDN'T stick out to you, and neither should the other one; in both cases TR and I put our own family out there for examination, and people examined it. I didn't really care that much, other than the amusement value in people trying to lecture me on how I was doing it wrong despite being pretty much totally successful, whereas TR thinks he's having his personal life unfairly examined. The other major difference is that you decided to come in here and take a crap all over everyone with your condescending post for some reason. Really, you want to call us out on our behavior at the same time you're calling us all "shitty people"?
Taskiss wrote:
You're giving your kid drugs 'cause you don't like her behavior. There's no other reason. There's no disorder except, perhaps, yours, thinking that there's something wrong with your kid.
I hope you live a long life and get to experience all that you deserve.
He'll deny it, but we all know that this was supposed to be interpreted as "I hope you suffer. **** off and die". To quote Pulp Fiction, that is some **** up, repugnant ****.
Quote:
TheRiov wrote:
No one else on this board gets targeted that way. And no this isn't me saying Poor me. I can take it. This is saying its a shit-filled thing to do to attack people who's politics you don't like by going after their personal lives and their family.
[...]
But we don't go after each others family, friends, acquaintances and relationships as a vector for board debate. Every person here has a laundry list of personal faults--in the 10+ years of this boards existence we're bound to accumulate a few details about the personal lives of others. Certain assholes on this board seem to take that as free ammo. The rest of the board at least has the class to avoid non-board related insults/judgements in their debate.
^ This.
Aside from the fact that other people DO get examined in this way when they put their personal lives in the middle of a discussion, and there's a lengthy history of people asking for advice or opinions, then getting mad when they got ones they didn't like. I can recall quite a few, and not specifically in Hellfire; it happens in Rants too.
TR just has had a habit of putting a little too much of his personal life out there for examination.. and has a history of saying some REALLY questionable things, so now when he does say something personal about himself, it attracts scrutiny. Some of that scrutiny is unfair (reference Taskiss's assumption of his motives for using ADHD medications), some of it is not.
Quote:
TheRiov wrote:
Actually I've said nothing about the Doctor's opinion. I've said that the people on the board commenting on it for the most part have no experience with ADHD and implied somewhat distantly, that they're just taking a fad opinion based on little actual research on the subject./quote]
^ And this.
And what makes the doctor's opinion a fad opinion? How exactly does he know what people's experience with ADHD might be? It's diagnosed often enough that probably almost all of us have at least passing experience with it.
Quote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
No tears you're not in my thoughts enough to generate any emotion. I just think its sad and funny (mostly sad) that an adult acts the way you do and worse yet you act more this way the older you get.
If you haven't noticed I don't post much in Hellfire or anywhere on here much anymore but I do browse and what struck me is that in all this time you haven't changed except to be even more of a warning why it's dangerous to think like you do.
^ And this.
Yeah, we're back to the "no emotion, yet sad" thing.. right. Because blatantly contradicting yourself makes sense.
Frankly, Elmo thinking something is "dangerous" is probably an indication that' it's a good idea.
As for you, a little self-examination might be in order. Like I've said before, you used to be one of the best, if not THE best poster around here in terms of civility and general reasonableness. I don't know who you are, but just let us know who you are and what you did with Stathol.