Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Talya wrote:
From the perspective of any given species, all that exists is there for that species. Anything we can use to our benefit, we should use to our benefit. There is no inherent value to "nature" apart from that which humanity gives it, because all value judgements are something we create.
That's pretty much true. While keeping environments clean and sustainable for our own benefit makes perfect sense, keeping it that way just for it's own sake is rather silly. We don't have some obligation to the universe not to make use of it. It's just our natural behavior.
Where other critters are involved, there is a natural tendency for humanity to feel some level of compassion. More importantly, in both the avoidance of harm to other critters and avoidance of harm to random environments (even lumps of rock devoid of life), there is
potential future value in maintaining that environment untainted.
Those things would fall under "our own benefit".
Quote:
For example, say we were able to indiscriminately dump all our radioactive waste on Mars. Seems like a great idea, but we might find a better use for Mars someday.
So it's not silly, but only in the sense that there could be some future value we haven't discovered yet.
By that argument, we could never make use of anything because it might have some even better use in the future that we haven't discovered, and even if we accept that argument, that wasn't what I was referring to. I was talking more about the generalized dismay at humans "trashing their environment" as if we have some objective obligation not to for its own sake.
In the case of Mars, we can obviously find much better places to dump radioactive waste than scattering it willy-nilly across that planet; space is really big, and there's plenty of other celestial bodies where radioactive waste could be disposed of. Even assuming we DID put it on Mars, taking basic precautions such as storing it in suitable containers, underground, and all in one place would make it highly unlikely that more than a very, very tiny portion of the planet would be affected.