FarSky wrote:
The idea that having children is some kind of moral imperative is as pants-on-head idiotic as the idea that tax breaks are what spur people to procreate.
The only thing pants-on-head-idiotic is thinking that this statement actually stands on its own as some sort of self-evident truth. Was it just laziness, or is passive-aggressively calling people idiots the favored way to spark an argument so you can dismiss them based on their posting style gotten down to this nonexistent level of effort now?
Talya wrote:
Certain people should probably be having more children. (Not that it's a moral imperative, it would just be good for the species/society as a whole.)
A far greater number of people should be having WAY fewer children.
If it could be arranged that the wealthy and prosperous had more children, while the poor had significantly fewer, the entire issue would disappear.
Or even adopt some. Maybe some of the I-don't-have-kids brigade could adopt a child or two. That'd be harder than posting furiously on the internet about allegedly stupid people though, so I'm not optimistic.