Screeling wrote:
I don't understand why having female friends requires being alone with them. I also am never alone behind closed doors with a woman other than my wife. I have plenty of friends that are not this way and I don't disparage them for it. I do it because I love my wife and one way I choose to show that is by conducting myself in a way that won't put her trust at risk. I also don't drink alcohol (no, not for religious reasons) and spend plenty of time in the company of people drinking.
In Pence's case, he's a politician. Any mentoring or whatever else is being denied to women (if that's really their beef) can happen in public places in full view of everybody else. There is also no reason it cannot happen with another person present. I don't see why he's accused of being a piece of crap for wanting to remain above suspicion, especially in an area where the only evidence of wrongdoing is based on hearsay regarding private, one-on-one meetings.
Pence isn't (solely) talking about being alone with women in private. His stance is that he can't do
anything alone with a woman, even if it's in public, like having dinner in a restaurant.
Like, I don't think you remember a lot of the commentary that was going on when this was in the news. People were relating anecdotes that were just pathologically ridiculous and then declaring men had a moral obligation to adhere to this "rule" even in such situations. One of my favorite ones was like one guy that hired an electrician to come do some work at his house, and then, assuming the electrician would be male, his wife went to run some errands. When a woman showed up, this guy had to tell her sorry, you can't come in here and do the scheduled work because I'm alone and you have two X chromosomes. And he was talking about how proud he was of this decision.
Diamondeye wrote:
Actually, no it really isn't.
It's not OK to criticize people for having moral stances you disagree with?