Monte wrote:
No peaceful protest by the left *ever* involved loaded assault rifles and calls for bloody, violent revolution, and certainly not as frequently as these Tea Party protests do. There were certainly enough insulting and inflammatory things said and waved at those protests, but nothing compares to carrying a loaded assault rifle.
The march on the GOP convention turned violent. There were multiple instances of threats against GW and other right leaning politicians during left leaning protests. I don't know of any instance of a Tea Party protest setting fire to a bank. BOTH sides have their fringe element being magnifyed by the media. If you really wanted to, I'm sure we could go instance for instance for pages.
Onto the loaded "assault" rifle. Such a loaded term and I really hate it because it plays off peoples ignorance. What you are labeling an assault rifle, if I take off the scary black plastic, becomes an acceptable varmint hunting rifle, and noone will bat an eyelash at it. It's sometimes referred to as rifle racism. Take the black off it, and it stops scaring white people.
It was a protest, and that was some people peacefully using their second and first amendment rights at the same time. Not sneaking around, just being there. And they knew it would get the far left into a tizzy. The same far left that seemed to forget the Black Panthers being armed during their protests of the President, or at the Philly polling sites. They were far more vocal, militant, and they threatened violence explictly.
I have no need for a tit for tat here, but we are focusing on the non issues here instead of the core problems that are spurring on the fringe behavior.