Aizle wrote:
Khross wrote:
Aizle wrote:
I believe it is incorrect to equate minimum standards with homogeneity. They are not the same, and one doesn't lead to the other.
History disagrees with you, I'm afraid.
If that were to be true Khross, then every school across the nation would have exactly the same performance, which we all know is false. There still are better and worse schools out there, regardless of what legislation is out there.
Minimum standards always lead to a lowering of expectations and disincentives to perform; and, yes, we are approaching an equilibrium state in the United States. However, that equilibrium state is far lower than it needs to be or would be. You have unqualified highschool and college graduates diluting the labor force and end markets for individuals with an education. And, amazingly, even school systems that are disproportionately regulated, like California, are failing to produce adequately trained or educated graduates for older college standards. Indeed, even the CEEB has lowered its standards so much that the GRE and SAT have no valid analog to IQ and individual knowledge based merit tests. Consequently, even statistical measures of performance are problematic.
And none of that really matters when faced with the largest problem of all: stupid people breed more.
_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.