The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:07 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Talya wrote:
With the exception of the very wealthy, investors would mostly still be far better off buying taxed investment vehicles without having to pay any income tax on anything than they would have been before. What would you rather pay, a tiny sales tax on your investments? Or a 30%-ish tax on all of your income apart from the small amount you are able to put into tax-deferred plans like you do now?


You are missing the point. People will take their tax-free paychecks and go shoot craps before they research, create and maintain a solid, diversified portfolio. Are they better off doing so? No. Are they going to do it anyways? Yes.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:02 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Hopwin wrote:
You are missing the point. People will take their tax-free paychecks and go shoot craps before they research, create and maintain a solid, diversified portfolio. Are they better off doing so? No. Are they going to do it anyways? Yes.
This argument is completely irrelevant to the discussion, seeing as how the individuals that will gamble before being fiscally responsible would do so anyway ... or somehow end up running the country.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
RangerDave wrote:
There's also the argument that speculative trades are an important/useful part of the price signaling provided by the market.

Why is price signaling important to the market? Oh, right -- because the market doesn't respond to actual prospects of the company, because the long-term prospects of the company are irrelevant to speculative trading.

Yes, you'd lose those price signals. But the price signals wouldn't be important, because the real merit of the stock is the company behind it again, not how it's been trending and signaling.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
There's also the argument that speculative trades are an important/useful part of the price signaling provided by the market.

Why is price signaling important to the market? Oh, right -- because the market doesn't respond to actual prospects of the company, because the long-term prospects of the company are irrelevant to speculative trading.

Yes, you'd lose those price signals. But the price signals wouldn't be important, because the real merit of the stock is the company behind it again, not how it's been trending and signaling.



Yeah, you get it.

Once again, there's at least a touch of "Devil's Advocacy" in my suggestion, because I'm not convinced taxing investment like this at all is a good idea. But it has positive aspects, and I believe on a flat consumption tax it would really be "fair." Exempting investment vehicles is like a tax break for the wealthy. If you don't tax it at the same rate, then to remain fair, that means you need to exempt everything at walmart, too.

This is why I don't like consumption taxes...

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
There's also the argument that speculative trades are an important/useful part of the price signaling provided by the market.

Why is price signaling important to the market? Oh, right -- because the market doesn't respond to actual prospects of the company, because the long-term prospects of the company are irrelevant to speculative trading. Yes, you'd lose those price signals. But the price signals wouldn't be important, because the real merit of the stock is the company behind it again, not how it's been trending and signaling.

I'm not sure there's such a clear disconnect between speculative trading and value investing though. This is one of those topics where very knowledgeable- and reasonable-sounding (to me at least) people seem to disagree. I've read articles and talked to securities analysts/lawyers who think speculative and technical trades are pure noise, screwing up the system for "legitimate" investors, but I've also read articles and talked to people who think the speculative and technical trades, while noisy and volatile over short time scales, are informative and efficiency-enhancing over the longer term. The arguments on each side are, honestly, beyond my ability to judge or even summarize, but the upshot is that I think it's an open question and hence I'd be reluctant to make any drastic changes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
If you're leery of penalizing speculative and technical trading, why not offer a "grace period" for reinvestment, where if you can prove that you liquidated a qualifying investment type X period of time before "reinvesting" it in another, similarly qualifying vehicle (a different stock, for instance), you get refunded the sales tax on the purchase of the reinvestment.

The downside, of course, is that you go and build the bureaucracy of the IRS back into the system, but maybe you can limit it to licensed fund managers or something who are able to qualify for this, and thus restrict it to brokerages and the like, which would limit the volume of paperwork needing to be filed because John Q. Public doesn't have a dozen Investment Tax Reimbursement Form 11763b's to file.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:31 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
If you're leery of penalizing speculative and technical trading, why not offer a "grace period" for reinvestment, where if you can prove that you liquidated a qualifying investment type X period of time before "reinvesting" it in another, similarly qualifying vehicle (a different stock, for instance), you get refunded the sales tax on the purchase of the reinvestment.

The downside, of course, is that you go and build the bureaucracy of the IRS back into the system, but maybe you can limit it to licensed fund managers or something who are able to qualify for this, and thus restrict it to brokerages and the like, which would limit the volume of paperwork needing to be filed because John Q. Public doesn't have a dozen Investment Tax Reimbursement Form 11763b's to file.



Yeah...that could be the equivalent of a tax sheltered retirement savings plan...you buy into it (paying the consumption tax up front), then all purchases made inside the plan afterward are tax free.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:11 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Khross wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
You are missing the point. People will take their tax-free paychecks and go shoot craps before they research, create and maintain a solid, diversified portfolio. Are they better off doing so? No. Are they going to do it anyways? Yes.
This argument is completely irrelevant to the discussion, seeing as how the individuals that will gamble before being fiscally responsible would do so anyway ... or somehow end up running the country.

Craps was a metaphor for blowing money. I did not mean it literally.

Taly:
I knew I was overlooking something huge yesterday. Buying stocks and bonds would be disincentivized under your plan. If buying a stock meant an immediate 12% loss on my funds through taxation I would buy a CD because it would outperform the asset I was buying.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:16 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Hopwin wrote:
Craps was a metaphor for blowing money. I did not mean it literally.
Again, people would do this anyway.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group