Kaffis Mark V wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
There's also the argument that speculative trades are an important/useful part of the price signaling provided by the market.
Why is price signaling important to the market? Oh, right -- because the market doesn't respond to actual prospects of the company, because the long-term prospects of the company are irrelevant to speculative trading.
Yes, you'd lose those price signals. But the price signals wouldn't be important, because the real merit of the stock is the company behind it again, not how it's been trending and signaling.
Yeah, you get it.
Once again, there's at least a touch of "Devil's Advocacy" in my suggestion, because I'm not convinced taxing investment like this at all is a good idea. But it has positive aspects, and I believe on a flat consumption tax it would really be "fair." Exempting investment vehicles is like a tax break for the wealthy. If you don't tax it at the same rate, then to remain fair, that means you need to exempt everything at walmart, too.
This is why I don't like consumption taxes...