The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 323 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:47 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Talya wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
No, my source was not Wikipedia. My source is The Journal of Sexual Medicine. The source is available online through multiple resources including a personal or academic (in my case) subscription. So, I guess I wasn't looking at the wrong numbers in the study I cited, while you weren't even looking at the study.


Yeah, right. Except you're a liar and a hypocrite and don't actually make honest arguments when religion is involved, and have been caught in such things before.


Ahhh, yes, here come the ad hominems. No I am not a liar and I have not "been caught in such things before". I know better than to demand you cite any instances of such, as they don't exist,so I won't bother.

Talya wrote:
When you link it, I'll believe you.


First go here:
Wiley
Then click the Athens option.


Talya wrote:

Perhaps, but more relevant than .03 to 3-9, which is outright wrong.


Prove it, with more than your opinion.

Talya wrote:
Uh...everything I said is supported by everything you just quoted. It essentially means that the percentages of society as a whole are just somewhat educated guesses.


Yet, you continue to use the numbers for pedophilia and sexual abuse of children interchangeably.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Talya wrote:
You lose all credibility as a rational thinker the moment you express anything except for utter contempt for religion

Wait - when did this become about religion? It's about human nature ... behavior, instinct, etc.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:50 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Talya wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
Talya wrote:
I am an Anglican preacher's daughter. While thankfully my father is a good, if misguided man, had he wanted access to his congregation's children, there would have been plenty of opportunities... Far more than cops and doctors.

Very few of the 41,489 priests in the US share a family background you can identify with, Taly.


Heh. It'd be amusing if dad were to post here. While most of the time, I've never met a kinder, gentler man, if you want to see him get vicious, start discussing the Catholic church. Not surprising, I suppose, coming from a good orange Belfast-born protestant...


Looks like the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 252
Talya wrote:
You lose all credibility as a rational thinker the moment you express anything except for utter contempt for religion, so, despite the innacuracy (prejudice implies judging before the evidence is presented. I've seen the evidence and no informed and sane person could excuse religion --this isn't prejudice, it's just a rational judgement), I'll take that as a complement.


If credibility with you was of any value to me whatsoever, this post might concern me.

I don't excuse religion, just like I don't excuse the rest of humanity. It's my opinion that singling out one segment, when humanity is quite capable of inhumanity, is the mark of prejudice, and you admitted to prejudice a few posts back.

And it's "compliment". Though I didn't compliment you. But whatever.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:02 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Taskiss wrote:
Talya wrote:
You lose all credibility as a rational thinker the moment you express anything except for utter contempt for religion

Wait - when did this become about religion? It's about human nature ... behavior, instinct, etc.


To the rest of us it is about the vagaries of human nature. For those with their own tuagh to grind it's always about those damn Catholics primarily and religion as a whole second.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Vindicarre wrote:
Ahhh, yes, here come the ad hominems. No I am not a liar and I have not "been caught in such things before". I know better than to demand you cite any instances of such, as they don't exist,so I won't bother.

Talya wrote:
When you link it, I'll believe you.


First go here:
Wiley
Then click the Athens option.



You're fortunate for several board wipes. Anyway, the link doesn't work. Password protected you see, so I'll have to take your word for it.

Wait, no I won't.

Quote:
Yet, you continue to use the numbers for pedophilia and sexual abuse of children interchangeably.

I don't see how you can say that....the figures mentioned in either case are only representative of those who sexually abuse children (and then, only those who get caught). There is no way to determine how many are pedophiles who do NOT eventually sexually abuse children. (If one believes such an animal commonly exists at all, that is. Which I don't.) Of course, the church figures of 1.5-5% of clergy is also only talking about those who abuse children. I really don't believe the specifics of the underlying psychological condition are relevant here, anyway. I don't care whether the boy-buggering bishop is actually a clinical pedophile.

Vindicarre wrote:
Looks like the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.


Dad's not wrong about the Catholic Church, or the havok they have wrought on Northern Ireland. His mistake is assuming his church is any different in a meaningful way.

Farther wrote:
I don't excuse religion, just like I don't excuse the rest of humanity. It's my opinion that singling out one segment, when humanity is quite capable of inhumanity, is the mark of prejudice, and you admitted to prejudice a few posts back.


As a gleeful misanthropist, I have very little but contempt for humanity as a whole, and in particular, human organizational structures. I have on several occasions demonstrated my disappointment with humanity in general, and everyone here who has paid attention will verify I lump religion right up there with government, big corporations, and even trade unions. They're all just means by which humans attempt to dominate and control each other, and worse yet, large organizational structures take on metapersonalities, independant of the views of those who compose them. All too often, those metapersonalities are at best sociopathic, while at worst utterly villainous. My lone concession is that we need at least a little government. We don't need the rest of them, not in their current forms. But here we are discussing the Catholic Church, not humanity as a whole. If the Church is reprehensible, it is reprehensible. We don't need to compare it to other churches or organizations or society at large to find out how reprehensible it is relative to the rest of you buggers*. Its relative moral standing cannot excuse it. (Though it can certainly condemn it.)

* "you buggers" referring to the unwashed masses of idiots that the world is primarily populated with.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:35 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
This might be my most successful Hellfire thread ever.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:36 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Lenas wrote:
This might be my most successful Hellfire thread ever.


In terms of pagecount at least, you're doing well.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
Lenas wrote:
This might be my most successful Hellfire thread ever.

In terms of pagecount at least, you're doing well.

Yeah, but starting a religion thread is kind of cheating, or should at least have the page count handicapped or something.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:54 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Talya wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
Ahhh, yes, here come the ad hominems. No I am not a liar and I have not "been caught in such things before". I know better than to demand you cite any instances of such, as they don't exist,so I won't bother.

You're fortunate for several board wipes.

Yup, I'm sure that if your memory was that clear about it someone else would confirm such instances of my ""been caught in such things before". No, it is because of "board wipes" not "Taly making **** up".

Talya wrote:
Anyway, the link doesn't work. Password protected you see, so I'll have to take your word for it.

Wait, no I won't.


Yup, because The All Knowing Taly doesn't have access, then no one does.

Talya wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
Yet, you continue to use the numbers for pedophilia and sexual abuse of children interchangeably.

I don't see how you can say that....the figures mentioned in either case are only representative of those who sexually abuse children (and then, only those who get caught).

I can say that because I've presented the percentage of the population that are pedophiles (3%-9%), as well as the percentage of Catholic priests (.03%), you gave the numbers of child sexual abusers who were Catholic priests (1.5-5%), what's the percentage of the general population that sexually abuses children? Since no one has give that number, and you've presented the number for Catholic priests what are you comparing it to?

Edit: I've since realized The Journal of Sexual Medicine study's subjects were located in Germany, so it's not appropriate for a comparison.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Last edited by Vindicarre on Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:03 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Vindicarre wrote:
you gave the numbers of child sexual abusers who were Catholic priests (1.5-5%),

You mean the percentage of catholic priests who are child abusers...

Roll your d20. If you roll a one, your cleric might get to bugger boys.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:10 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Here's some more:

www.religioustolerance.org wrote:
How common is the abuse?
In moral panics, as in wars, truth is often the first victim. There is massive speculation about the scope of the abuse. But there is also an almost complete lack of reliable data. Much heat is being generated, and very little light. Some claim that sexual abuse by priests is quite common; others claim that: "There is no good data either from the general population or from the priesthood about numbers of pedophiles or people who have a vulnerability that increases their risk to children. The issue of sexuality, particularly of people who may have unusual kinds of sexual cravings, has been one that society has tended to sweep under the carpet. Getting that data is terribly important, but as of now I know of no systematic surveys that would allow us to come to any firm conclusions." Two widely circulated estimates suggest that approximately 2% to 6% of Roman Catholic priests abuse children and youths. This compares with other common estimates: that perhaps 1% of all adults and 2% of all adult males are abusive pedophiles. However, priests have freer access to many children than does the average male. His position of authority and trust can facilitate abuse. Thus the number of abused young people per abusive priest may well be larger than for the average molester. William Reid has written that "careful studies have indicated...that child molesters commit an average of sixty offenses for every incident that comes to public attention." But Thomas Fox estimates that the "average pedophile priest abuses victims."


http://www.religioustolerance.org/clergy_sex6.htm
(sources given in the essay)

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:30 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Wow some actual research.

Quote:
Two widely circulated estimates suggest that approximately 2% to 6% of Roman Catholic priests abuse children and youths. This compares with other common estimates: that perhaps 1% of all adults and 2% of all adult males are abusive pedophiles.


Abuse children and youths /= abusive pedophiles. Not apples to apples.

How about we continue from the same article:
Quote:
Unfortunately, precise data on abuse is not available. Data is largely based on experts' opinions. But perhaps the following might be helpful:

In another essay, we describe various estimates of the percentage of Roman Catholic priests who engage in sexual activities with persons under the age of 18. They range from 0.12% to 6%. In the absence of precise data, a value of 3% might be a reasonable guess.
If the 3% value is accurate, then it is important to remember that 97% of priests are not sexually abusive to children and adults.
In the same essay, investigators have estimated that between 90% and 98% of the abusers victimize post-pubertal adolescents, while the rest assault pre-pubertal children. A value of 95% might be a reasonable guess.
The percentage of males in the general population who sexually abuse young children is unknown. Some estimates are in the range of 1%
If those data are accurate then:
About 0.15% of priests sexually abuse young children.
This is perhaps 1/8 the rate of men generally.
Priests have a much lower rate of abusive pedophilia than does the general population of men.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:58 am 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
And therefore as a stranger give it welcome.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Some of us choose celibacy when we withdraw from the world. The older you get the less strong the imperative, and has been mentioned before low testosterone levels in men lead to a diminished sex drive.

There are plenty of good men in the clergy (at least 94% by the figures above) that dedicate their lives to God and choose to honor their vows of celibacy. Yet within every cassock you see a child raping monster.

You sirs, who believe and spread this libel, this scurrilous debasement of a religious calling, are the monsters. You are merely the latest wave of evil scoundrels who seek to discredit those who choose to do the greater good because they are not like you. You would bring all of humanity down to and below your own level rather than admit there are some men in control of their baser instincts.

You have lost all credibility with me. Nothing you say can be taken as honest, from this point henceforth.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:08 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Talya wrote:
That the church (catholic and otherwise) is a harmful force for human society now as it has been throughout history is undeniable to any logical and rational thinker. Any argument otherwise is nothing more than apologism at best. Being "bigoted against the church" is said like it's a bad thing. The church is a murdering, book-burning, child-abusing, rapist, tyrant and villain. I happen to be bigotted against murderers, book burners, child abusers, rapists, tyrants, and villains, I will freely admit--but such a statement is absurd. Everyone should be bigoted against such things. So don't expect any concessions in regard to the diabolical human organizations known as "religions."


I am taking major offense to this. Who fed the people in Louisiana during the oil spill? How many schools did the Catholic Church build last year worldwide? How many orphanages did the Catholic Church run over the past 200 years? How many people have priests counselled out of suicide, murder, rape and theft?

Canadians burn books, rape people, abuse children therefore Canada is bad for the world. Get off your damn high horse.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:48 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Hopwin wrote:
I am taking major offense to this. Who fed the people in Louisiana during the oil spill? How many schools did the Catholic Church build last year worldwide? How many orphanages did the Catholic Church run over the past 200 years? How many people have priests counselled out of suicide, murder, rape and theft?

You can't excuse the millenia of still ongoing harm with a few acts of charity (using money they mostly stole to begin with). As Stephen Fry quite aptly put it, such arguments are like a thief in front of a judge saying, "I don't know why you keep bringing the burglary into this. I help my dad cross the street in the mornings." Religion is wholely "evil." I'm sorry if you take offense at that, but it doesn't make that wicked institution any better, nor does it make your god any more real.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Last edited by Talya on Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:55 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Vindicarre wrote:
Abuse children and youths /= abusive pedophiles. Not apples to apples.


Like I said earlier, the clinical definition of pedophilia does not matter. I don't care whether the boy-buggering bishop fits the actual definition of "pedophile" or not. It doesn't matter what they are. It matters what they do.

Quote:
absence of precise data, a value of 3% might be a reasonable guess.


Which is still 50% higher than the 2% of adult males in general which do the same thing.

Quote:
If the 3% value is accurate, then it is important to remember that 97% of priests are not sexually abusive to children and adults.


Gee, it's not like I said the vast majority of priests are not involved in this earlier, is it? Or did you miss that?

Quote:
In the same essay, investigators have estimated that between 90% and 98% of the abusers victimize post-pubertal adolescents, while the rest assault pre-pubertal children. A value of 95% might be a reasonable guess.

Yeah, but once again, that doesn't matter. Whether he's 17 or 5, it's still raping children.

Quote:
Priests have a much lower rate of abusive pedophilia than does the general population of men

... are you trying to use the irrelevant clinical definition once again? STOP TRYING TO MOVE THE GOALPOSTS. We are not discussing how many priests get hardons looking at little boys. We're talking about how many priests use those hardons on people under the age of consent.

And then you're still missing the biggest crime in all this -- it's not that some freak perverts managed to sneak by the screening process and commit these terrible acts. It's that the catholic church as an institution has for centuries engaged in a coverup process, doing its best to prevent these abuses from being common knowledge and sheltering the men who did it. Even if, against the evidence, priests are less likely to abuse boys than men in the general populace, the systemic protection and absolution these monsters have gotten from an organization that is supposed to exist for the salvation of its followers is heinous. Only in very recent years, with the massive outcry and publicity, have they been forced to at least pay lip-service to justice, but they still do their best to sweep it all under the rug and deny it has ever been a problem. There can be no forgiveness for this. As an organization, the church is wholely reprehensible, and utterly without "goodness."

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Talya wrote:
We are not discussing how many priests get hardons looking at little boys. We're talking about how many priests use those hardons on people under the age of consent.

Actually, we were talking about the possibility of celibacy being a contributing factor to pedophilia. You moved the posts and made it about religion in an effort to condemn the Catholic Church.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Micheal wrote:
You sirs, who believe and spread this libel, this scurrilous debasement of a religious calling, are the monsters....You have lost all credibility with me. Nothing you say can be taken as honest, from this point henceforth.

To whom is this comment directed, Micheal?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:28 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Talya wrote:
...


I'll repeat the source you presented:
Quote:
If those data are accurate then:
About 0.15% of priests sexually abuse young children.
This is perhaps 1/8 the rate of men generally.
Priests have a much lower rate of abusive pedophilia than does the general population of men.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Talya wrote:
Yeah, but once again, that doesn't matter. Whether he's 17 or 5, it's still raping children.

I totally disagree with that statement, Talya (and with the general ire you're expressing toward the Catholic Church as a whole, but that's a tangential discussion I'm not involved in anyway, so 'nuff said). There's a very big difference between attraction to and sex with a 17 year old and attraction to and sex with a 5 year old, both in terms of the psychology of the adult and the impact on the minor. Conflating the two just muddies the waters of what's going on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Vindicarre wrote:
Priests have a much lower rate of abusive pedophilia than does the general population of men.


And yet they have an even-to-300% rate of abusing boys.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Last edited by Talya on Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:49 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
RangerDave wrote:
Talya wrote:
Yeah, but once again, that doesn't matter. Whether he's 17 or 5, it's still raping children.

I totally disagree with that statement, Talya (and with the general ire you're expressing toward the Catholic Church as a whole, but that's a tangential discussion I'm not involved in anyway, so 'nuff said). There's a very big difference between attraction to and sex with a 17 year old and attraction to and sex with a 5 year old, both in terms of the psychology of the adult and the impact on the minor. Conflating the two just muddies the waters of what's going on.


Once again, the psychology does not matter here. I don't care whether you diddle toddlers or abuse your "god-given" authority to rape teenagers, either way you should have your nuts chewed on by a pitbull before being converted to pig-food, along with anyone who protects you.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Talya wrote:
Once again, the psychology does not matter here. I don't care whether you diddle toddlers or abuse your "god-given" authority to rape teenagers, either way you should have your nuts chewed on by a pitbull before being converted to pig-food, along with anyone who protects you.

Well, the psychology matters a great deal when seeking a solution to the problem. If a priest is attracted to 5 year old boys, he's a pedophile and he can never, in any context or under any circumstance, satisfy his sexual urges without committing abuse. On the other hand, if a priest is attracted to 17 year old boys, chances are decent that he may simply be gay, and thus he can find non-abusive outlets for his sex drive. Personally, I suspect much of the abuse by Catholic priests likely falls into the latter category, which is why I tend to think the celibacy and anti-homosexuality doctrines of the Church contributed to it.


Last edited by RangerDave on Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:23 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
RangerDave wrote:
Well, the psychology matters a great deal when seeking a solution to the problem.

I've got a solution to the problem...

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 323 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 274 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group