The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 10:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
More likely, his point was that maybe our notion that teenagers can't handle combined bathrooms and locker rooms may have something to do with our culture, and not be strictly a necessity.

Since obviously people can handle being unisex pools ok, even though it was once (and is still in some cultural groups) considered taboo.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
NephyrS wrote:
Moving past the injustice angle, why not just let the admittedly few people with a legitimate intersexual or transsexual condition be allowed to use the facilities they feel more comfortable in?

Well, to keep the discussion in line with the OP... what is being proposed is considerably beyond this.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
NephyrS wrote:
DE:

Perhaps we have different definitions of injustice. From MW, injustice implies an unfairness against the party with a grievance. I think we can certainly agree that it is unfair that one group should be made to feel uncomfortable with their bathroom/locker room facilities just so a second group can feel comfortable.

The magnitude is debatable, as Ladas points out- obviously, on one hand you have something that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, and on the other hand, you have something that makes only a few people uncomfortable... But pleasing one group at the cost of another group does pretty distinctly constitute an injustice.


I don't see how it does. Failing to please someone or make them comfortable isn't an injustice at all. An injustice is when you intentionally go out of your way to harm them, make them more uncomfortable than necessary, humiliate them, etc, not when those things happen as a result of equal treatment in the first place. We should try to please and make comfortable as many people as we reasonably can, but we can't please everyone.

Quote:
Moving past the injustice angle, why not just let the admittedly few people with a legitimate intersexual or transsexual condition be allowed to use the facilities they feel more comfortable in?


Because it will make far more people uncomfortable. If these people want to use the facilities they prefer, they should wait until such time as they get medical correction to make that appropriate for them. If it's not serious enough to require that, or they feel that option isn't appropriate for them, they should deal with the hand they're dealt.

Quote:
It shouldn't be many, and they are not disrupting the use of the facilities for anyone else- it might make a few people uncomfortable, but it isn't like you're making the bathrooms completely unisex.


It's far more than "a few", the vast majority of people are very uncomfortable at the idea of having to share such facilities with the opposite sex. If that discomfort were not the prevailing feeling, we'd already have integrated facilities. I don't, in any case see the "few" uncomfortable people being any "fewer" than this vague group of people with gender issues, and so I don't see any reason to spend any special effort on their feelings.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Technically, however, you are not sharing the facility with someone of the opposite sex.

If I have XY chromosomes, I should be able to use the men's bathroom and play on male sports teams- it's my 'right'.

If I have an XX chromosome, I should be able to play on female sports teams and use the women's bathroom.

Is a male student asked to no longer use the men's restroom if he wears drag?

This is not really a case of equal treatment. We are taking a subset of people and telling them they cannot act the same way as others of their biological gender due to the way they look.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Just thought I'd throw this in in case anyone was getting the wrong idea:

I have no hugely vested personal interest in this, it's just a discussion I've been interested in having for a while, and I like feeling out peoples viewpoints. Admittedly in a slightly argumentative fashion.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:52 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Quote:
Moving past the injustice angle, why not just let the admittedly few people with a legitimate intersexual or transsexual condition be allowed to use the facilities they feel more comfortable in?


How do you effectively tell these people apart from the "old fashioned perverts" who will inevitably try to subvert this law to be peepers.

I'm just not sure how "reasonably" they can be accomodated.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:19 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
NephyrS wrote:
Technically, however, you are not sharing the facility with someone of the opposite sex.

If I have XY chromosomes, I should be able to use the men's bathroom and play on male sports teams- it's my 'right'.

If I have an XX chromosome, I should be able to play on female sports teams and use the women's bathroom.


You're begging the question. It isn't the presence of the chromasomes that makes you a male for social purposes; it's your external genetalia that determine what sex you are for that purpose. People aren't made uncomfortable by chromosomes; they're made uncomfortable by genetalia. You should not be able to use the bathroom or play on sports teams that match your chromasomes; you should play on those that match your genitals. That's what causes social issues, and really, it's the sexual equipment of everyone else that makes you want to be in that bathroom or on that team, not their invisible chromosomes.

Quote:
Is a male student asked to no longer use the men's restroom if he wears drag?


No, he should be asked not to use the women's room. Very few women want to share the restroom with a man in drag, or with a male that wants to become female. It doesn't matter if he just likes wearing panties or actually ahs a medical problem with his gender identification; he shouldn't be treated as a female for those purposes unless he gets himself altered.

Quote:
This is not really a case of equal treatment. We are taking a subset of people and telling them they cannot act the same way as others of their biological gender due to the way they look.


No, we're telling them they must act the same way as everyone else who expresses the gender they express. It is equal treatment. They're trying to get special treatment in regard to social issues based on an internal, invisible medical problem - one that is not even debilitating in nature.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 245 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group