Monte wrote:
I want to get something straight -
Several conservative activists bring loaded assault rifles to peaceful protests. This is seen as an act of liberty. This protest includes violent, hateful language.
A black man brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.
One of these is seen as intimidation. The other is seen as liberty. What, pray tell, is the differentiating factor? (Other than the fact that an assault rifle is a significantly more intimidating weapon than a billy club). Both of these examples are of folks who did not break the law. Remember, cops were called to the polling place, and no arrests were made. No voters complained of intimidation, only poll watchers, and poll watchers are just party loyalists.
You mean besides the fact that people were VOTING at one of them? You don't think the fact that one took place at a polling place (a place where everyone should be able to cast their vote without having any kind of protest directed at them) and the other was at a protest (a place for, you know, protesting) is significant?
No of course not. You just want them to be equivalent, so you just ignore factors like that.
Then of course there's the fact that whatever happened at the protest, it wasn't directed at anyone physically present, as opposed to the idiots at the polling place who
threatened people physically present.