The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Darn Racist Teabaggers!

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Monte wrote:
The Bush Adminstration did make the initial choice to not prosecute. Were they being racist or was there some conspiracy then? If there isn't one under the Bush administration, why are you accusing the Obama administration of some nefarious plot? Is it, perhaps, because Obama and Holder are black (I ask because the sources that have blown this story out of proportion have been screaming racism to the hills)? And if so, why should that have anything to do with it?

In other words, if the Bush administration (white president, white AG) didn't see any need to prosecute, and if the Republican vice chairwoman of the US Comission on Civil Rights said it was "Overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges", then when is it suddenly a scandal?



The money quotes start at around 1:40 in:


_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:24 am 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Dash,

is that pwnt by the people you are trying to defend?

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:18 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Why would anyone defend these racist shitbags?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
I want to get something straight -

Several conservative activists bring loaded assault rifles to peaceful protests. This is seen as an act of liberty. This protest includes violent, hateful language.

A black man brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.

One of these is seen as intimidation. The other is seen as liberty. What, pray tell, is the differentiating factor? (Other than the fact that an assault rifle is a significantly more intimidating weapon than a billy club). Both of these examples are of folks who did not break the law. Remember, cops were called to the polling place, and no arrests were made. No voters complained of intimidation, only poll watchers, and poll watchers are just party loyalists.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
That's quite a shift from what you said earlier. Do you still contend it was the Bush administration that dropped the charges?

As for the apples to oranges comparison you're trying to make, you know you're reaching with that ;)

The bottom line is, this man was clearly engaged in a textbook case of voter intimidation. Would have been convicted of such by default, but was protected by the Obama administration. We have the leader of his organization admitting to as much on video.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Intimidating is an act, its not a piece of equipment.

Neither the guns nor the club intimidate.

The person does, and can suggest the usage of a tool as an aid.

Since one was using violent and hateful language at a polling place (illegal) and the others were being peaceful and respectful - yes there is a difference. Your own choice of language in fact highlights this difference.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
The difference is: the first is engaging in democracy, the second is obstructing it.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:27 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Monte wrote:
A black manracist shitbag brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.


Fixed it for ya.

The tea party protests aren't racist. You *think* they are. but they're not. Can you show me a video of a group of protesters being racist shitbags? Sayin, Let's kill all the niggers, and lets see how they feel when we get a white man back in charge?

I don't think you can.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:45 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Monte wrote:
I want to get something straight -

Several conservative activists bring loaded assault rifles to peaceful protests. This is seen as an act of liberty. This protest includes violent, hateful language.

A black man brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.

One of these is seen as intimidation. The other is seen as liberty. What, pray tell, is the differentiating factor? (Other than the fact that an assault rifle is a significantly more intimidating weapon than a billy club). Both of these examples are of folks who did not break the law. Remember, cops were called to the polling place, and no arrests were made. No voters complained of intimidation, only poll watchers, and poll watchers are just party loyalists.


By that logic, a large (or strong, or trained) person capable of inflicting great physical harm to those around him should not be allowed at these protests, voting demonstrations etc.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:19 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Monte wrote:
I want to get something straight -

Several conservative activists bring loaded assault rifles to peaceful protests. This is seen as an act of liberty. This protest includes violent, hateful language.

A black man brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.

One of these is seen as intimidation. The other is seen as liberty. What, pray tell, is the differentiating factor? (Other than the fact that an assault rifle is a significantly more intimidating weapon than a billy club). Both of these examples are of folks who did not break the law. Remember, cops were called to the polling place, and no arrests were made. No voters complained of intimidation, only poll watchers, and poll watchers are just party loyalists.


You mean besides the fact that people were VOTING at one of them? You don't think the fact that one took place at a polling place (a place where everyone should be able to cast their vote without having any kind of protest directed at them) and the other was at a protest (a place for, you know, protesting) is significant?

No of course not. You just want them to be equivalent, so you just ignore factors like that.

Then of course there's the fact that whatever happened at the protest, it wasn't directed at anyone physically present, as opposed to the idiots at the polling place who threatened people physically present.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Monte wrote:
Several conservative activists bring loaded assault rifles to peaceful protests. This is seen as an act of liberty. This protest includes violent, hateful language.

A black man brings a billy club to a polling place, and uses violent hateful language.

What, pray tell, is the differentiating factor?
One is someone exercising a constitutional right, the other an attempt to suppress a constitutional right by intimidation.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:25 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
I recognize one similarity:
They were both black men.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
racist

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 208 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group